By
Erwina Tri Astuti
1507042028
There
are many challenges to integrating technology into teaching and learning.
Ertmer et al. (1999) described technology integration barriers in two major
categories: first and second- order barriers. First-order barriers, that refer
to obstacle that are external to teachers, include such barriers as lack of
resources, institution, subject culture, and assessment. On the other hand,
second-order barriers are intrinsic to teachers and include such obstacles as attitudes, beliefs,
knowledge, and skills. Unfortunately, today many schools lack the platforms
necessary to use the digital learning tools now being rapidly developed and in
many countries nationwide, access to low-cost broadband internet for all
students and teachers is lacking. For many countries, the professional
development necessary to train teachers to deliver digital instruction is still
being developed, and there are a large number of teachers lacking basic
computer literacy skills.
Although high-level technology uses tend to be
associated with learner-centered or constructivist practices, lacking the
essential technology skills, teachers tend to use technology mostly for communication
and low-level tasks, such as word processing, drill-and-practice activities,
and exploring websites, many of which align minimally with core pedagogical
goals (Becker, 1994; Brush & Saye, 2009). In order to help teachers create
technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms, it is essential to
understand: (a) how they perceive learner-centered instruction as well as
technology; (b) what kinds of barriers they face in creating
technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms; and (c) what kind of support
they need to create such classrooms. It is also possible that teachers who are
learner-centered in philosophy are teacher-centered in actual practice.
Learner-centered philosophy does not necessarily lead to learner-centered
practice. Many things can cause such inconsistency but this is actually because
of the long lasting effects of behaviorism dominated educational practices for
decades.
Since
behaviorism and constructivism both continue to be seen relevant in today’s
world of online education, in order to avoid digital traditional practices in
classrooms, it is essential to clarify the criteria for constructivist online
learning so that successful practical applications of constructivism can be
identified and implemented to positively affect learning. With the substantial
increase in the number of available technologies, educators
should pay
special attention to differentiate between the technologies supporting
constructivist learning platforms and behaviorist learning practices.
There are many
factors to be considered in designing curricula and employing instructional
strategies apt to the contextual variables shaping the learning environments.
It should be kept in mind that student learning depends primarily on what the
students do rather than what the teacher does. So, educators are supposed to
provide the learners with suitable instructional technology tools to make
them think, reflect and develop ideas,and then to test their ideas in a
practical meaningful context. Teachers’ new role is integrating technology into
the curriculum so that learners build on their own experiences, construct their
own meanings, create products, and solve problems successfully. Educational
institutions should give up filling the learners’ minds with a bunch of
pre-planned content. Instead, they should focus on how to enable learners to
find, identify, manipulate and evaluate information and knowledge, to integrate
this knowledge in their world of work and life, to solve problems, and to
communicate this knowledge to others. Teachers as coaches and mentors are the
major actors in learning environments and they are also supposed to be digital
learners of the new age.
References
Mustafa Er and Neslihan Fatma Er.(2013). “Instructional
technology as a tool in creating constructivist
Classrooms”.Department of Foreign Languages Education,Turkish Air Force
Academy, İstanbul, 34149, Turkey.
Mustafa Er and Neslihan Fatma Er.(2013). “Instructional
technology as a tool in creating constructivist
Classrooms”.
b
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, İstanbul Kültür
University,İstanbul 34156, Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 1441 – 1445
Lawrence Tomei Ed.D. (2005).” Instructional technology and
distance learning”. Duquesne
University. International
Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment